Showing posts with label references. Show all posts
Showing posts with label references. Show all posts

Tuesday, 29 April 2008

Language affects thoughts about life

ucumari @ Flickr

Some more recent stuff, this time for the Language, Thought and Modularity of Mind course: language makes a difference when it comes to knowing what's alive and what's not.

Deluded? Look into my eyes...


Interesting one for the neuropsychiatrists: hypnosis might be useful in treating delusional disorders.

Sunday, 27 April 2008

How to reference in exams

thomashawk @ Flickr

I mention this now because some of you will be starting to learn references some time soon.

The APA says that with three to five authors the first reference to a paper includes all authors. Subsequent citations in the same essay may refer to the paper by the principal author plus "et al." For six authors the correct format is (Principal author et al., Year).

Obviously you do this for coursework essays, but when it comes to exams I think it is fine - and all the lecturers I have asked agree - to relax this a bit. Please do check with the individual lecturers, but this is how I did it:
  • 1-3 authors all named first then "et al" after that
  • 3+ authors, do "et al"
Again, be sure to check this is acceptable, but it's just a nice little way of cutting down the memory load - some of those psychologists have crazy names. The fewer you need to remember the better.

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

The online hub

bfionline @ Flickr

You will have spent a long time on your essays, familiarising yourself with an area to exam-level detail. Fortunately, you only have to do an essay per course for coursework. Unfortunately, for exams you need to know lots more. One shortcut to familiarising yourself with all this other material is to read each others essays.

Last year many of the Level 3 psychologists compiled their essays on an online hub. Essays were uploaded along with the mark they got, any important comments made by the marker and without any identifying information.

The beauty of this is that you can quickly use the legwork done by others to get to a good level of understanding. In addition, you should be able to improve your own communication skills by noting in others what is effortless to read and what is horrible.

It's a great little resource and last year's was very successful but its power rests on you lot uploading your essays. To do this, first, remove your name from the doc, add your mark in a nice fat font size at the top (plus any marker comments you deem necessary), make sure the document is saved with the essay question in the file name and then head here to MediaMax and enter these details :

username: brain_milk
password: i/l/i/k/e/s/h/a/r/i/n/g
[remove all the "/" - this is to avoid bots]

After this navigate your way to right folder, or create your own if I have left one out, and upload.

Do make an effort to upload guys and gals, we all found it was a great thing to have last year...

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

Two thousand and eighting

Referencing the most recent research immediately says to the marker that you have had a scoot around the literature and are at the cutting edge. It's so impressive and will give markers a nice warm feeling.

The only way a "(2008)" can be topped in your essay is with an "(in press)". That said, you can probably beat that with an "(in preparation)"; you're so in the groove you're citing papers that haven't yet been finished.

That's the major reason I have put the "Cutting edge" links over in the top right. They are updated automatically based on syndicated content taken direct from research groups or universities' news outlets. There might be the occasional oddity but all the research is hot off the press and hopefully there will be an occasional gem that makes you think, 'Ooh this would be great in...".

Where the 'Cutting Edge' links fall short, use PubMed or whatever you use to search and then sort the results so that the most recent is first. I believe you can also set up automated emails based on search terms using PubMed, so you are informed when anything new comes out.

The other neat thing about the most recent papers is that the first couple paras of the introduction should (if it is any good) bring you up to speed on the literature, including smoothing out any confusions that you may be getting upset over in older papers. So if you are getting in a muddle about things (which is normal) head for a recent paper to see if it can help.